I’m quite pissed off, actually.

Because I read this. For your information, let me reproduce some pertinent parts:

6.1 Bad language, including expletives and profanity is offensive to many people. The use of crude words and derogatory terms is most likely to cause offence and especially if the language is contrary to audience expectation. Bad language includes the following:

i) Offensive Language
The use of disparaging or abusive words which is calculated to offend an individual or a group of persons is not permitted.

ii) Crude References
Words, in any language commonly used in Malaysia, which are considered obscene or profane are prohibited including crude references to sexual intercourse and sexual organs. It is, however, permissible to use such words in the context of their ordinary meaning and not when intended as crude language.


So, my being “pissed off”, a crude reference to the act of “pissing” is in contravention of the guidelines laid down, specifically 6.1 (ii), or rather the expression thereof.

And this too, is interesting:

7.3 Content which is false, is expressly prohibited except in any of the following circumstances:

(a) satire and parody;
(b) where it is clear to an ordinary user that the content is fiction.

So, for example, if I said the Pink Elephant God doesn’t exist, I can only talk about the Pink Elephant God if and only if I make it clear that I’m satirizing the Pink Elephant God or I’m making him/her/it up, yes? But what if there are true believers of the Pink Elephant God, eh? If I declare my written piece on said God to be satire or fictional and it offends such persons, what next? Or suppose I write about said Pink Elephant God getting “shafted with a fire hydrant”, what then?

fucking, yes, FUCKING nazis!

declaration: Oh, I’m parodying insensate blog bastards who don’t know any better, with the above content. I’ll try something more reasoned and serious when I’m well and ready.

Ugh. Shit, now I miss those BBS days…