<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: laws of the jungle</title>
	<link>http://xpyre.blogsome.com/2005/09/14/laws-of-the-jungle/</link>
	<description>mildly amused</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: xpyre</title>
		<link>http://xpyre.blogsome.com/2005/09/14/laws-of-the-jungle/#comment-88</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:42:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xpyre.blogsome.com/2005/09/14/laws-of-the-jungle/#comment-88</guid>
					<description>totoro&amp;gt; Hey, thanks! I'm going through it right now, actually, and it's sounding more and more draconian with each passing word...

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Seditious tendency.
3. —(1) A seditious tendency is a tendency —

(a) to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the Government;

(b) to excite the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore to attempt to procure in Singapore, the alteration, otherwise than by lawful means, of any matter as by law established;

(c) to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the administration of justice in Singapore;

(d) to raise discontent or disaffection amongst the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore;

(e) to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Singapore.
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

hmmm... 

Edrei&amp;gt; I think the best way will be to self-legislate, which is what the content code is for, I suppose.  Maybe it should be a matter of discussion whether the content code adequately protects bloggers, their readers and such.  Getting a concensus from the blogging community, most of whom aren't concerned about this issue, will be quite difficult..  It's worth a thought, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>totoro&gt; Hey, thanks! I&#8217;m going through it right now, actually, and it&#8217;s sounding more and more draconian with each passing word&#8230;</p>
	<blockquote><p>
Seditious tendency.<br />
3. —(1) A seditious tendency is a tendency —</p>
	<p>(a) to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the Government;</p>
	<p>(b) to excite the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore to attempt to procure in Singapore, the alteration, otherwise than by lawful means, of any matter as by law established;</p>
	<p>(c) to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the administration of justice in Singapore;</p>
	<p>(d) to raise discontent or disaffection amongst the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore;</p>
	<p>(e) to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Singapore.
</p></blockquote>
	<p>hmmm&#8230; </p>
	<p>Edrei&gt; I think the best way will be to self-legislate, which is what the content code is for, I suppose.  Maybe it should be a matter of discussion whether the content code adequately protects bloggers, their readers and such.  Getting a concensus from the blogging community, most of whom aren&#8217;t concerned about this issue, will be quite difficult..  It&#8217;s worth a thought, though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Edrei</title>
		<link>http://xpyre.blogsome.com/2005/09/14/laws-of-the-jungle/#comment-87</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:43:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xpyre.blogsome.com/2005/09/14/laws-of-the-jungle/#comment-87</guid>
					<description>See...I said it before and I'll say it again, if people were a little smarter...we won't need to trouble ourselves with laws like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>See&#8230;I said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again, if people were a little smarter&#8230;we won&#8217;t need to trouble ourselves with laws like this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: totoro</title>
		<link>http://xpyre.blogsome.com/2005/09/14/laws-of-the-jungle/#comment-85</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:41:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xpyre.blogsome.com/2005/09/14/laws-of-the-jungle/#comment-85</guid>
					<description>Singapore Seditions Act is &lt;a href=&quot;http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/non_version/cgi-bin/cgi_retrieve.pl?&amp;amp;actno=Reved-290&amp;amp;date=latest&amp;amp;method=part&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

I found it a couple of days ago when I Googled for 'Singapore Seditions Act'...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Singapore Seditions Act is <a href="http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/non_version/cgi-bin/cgi_retrieve.pl?&amp;actno=Reved-290&amp;date=latest&amp;method=part">here</a>.</p>
	<p>I found it a couple of days ago when I Googled for &#8216;Singapore Seditions Act&#8217;&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
