<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: writing on blogging</title>
	<link>http://xpyre.blogsome.com/2005/10/06/writing-on-blogging/</link>
	<description>mildly amused</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Edrei</title>
		<link>http://xpyre.blogsome.com/2005/10/06/writing-on-blogging/#comment-114</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 10:32:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xpyre.blogsome.com/2005/10/06/writing-on-blogging/#comment-114</guid>
					<description>Waa lau wei. When I read your comments, I thought you mistook my comments for your blog post. There is nothing wrong with the word blogosphere though. We all exist as one whole blogosphere. 

But like a city in which all people live in, there is always the downtown area where the gutters are unclean and the people uncouth. We got to realise that there is nothing wrong with classification because it is well...more...&quot;civillized&quot; to be orderly and have everything in its place. 

Naysayers say that this oppresses the right to be free, but like we talked about before, freedom works when you have a mind to think and responsibilities that you follow. 

I'm not saying blogging for an audience is completely wrong (probloggers for instance NEED the audience). I just don't agree with it when  whatever blogs come about it are nothing better than spam posts. Blog with reason. Then you have all the right to be free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Waa lau wei. When I read your comments, I thought you mistook my comments for your blog post. There is nothing wrong with the word blogosphere though. We all exist as one whole blogosphere. </p>
	<p>But like a city in which all people live in, there is always the downtown area where the gutters are unclean and the people uncouth. We got to realise that there is nothing wrong with classification because it is well&#8230;more&#8230;&#8221;civillized&#8221; to be orderly and have everything in its place. </p>
	<p>Naysayers say that this oppresses the right to be free, but like we talked about before, freedom works when you have a mind to think and responsibilities that you follow. </p>
	<p>I&#8217;m not saying blogging for an audience is completely wrong (probloggers for instance NEED the audience). I just don&#8217;t agree with it when  whatever blogs come about it are nothing better than spam posts. Blog with reason. Then you have all the right to be free.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark My Words</title>
		<link>http://xpyre.blogsome.com/2005/10/06/writing-on-blogging/#comment-113</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:30:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://xpyre.blogsome.com/2005/10/06/writing-on-blogging/#comment-113</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;BLOG is such a dirty 4-letter word&lt;/strong&gt;

But have we really forgotten? That everyone who jumps on this online bandwagon does so for their own unique reasons? Who are we to tell them what to do? Who are we to judge someone to be better than another? Who are we to say what a weblog is or is n...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>BLOG is such a dirty 4-letter word</strong></p>
	<p>But have we really forgotten? That everyone who jumps on this online bandwagon does so for their own unique reasons? Who are we to tell them what to do? Who are we to judge someone to be better than another? Who are we to say what a weblog is or is n&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
