“Higher criticism”?

MENJ’s appeal to the historical-critical method is a red herring. He wasn’t applying ‘higher criticism’, he was applying his own version of some form of ‘meta-something’ criticism which has lost its footing. “Higher criticism” has closer relations to hermeneutics than polemics, dear sir, and I can’t see how in any way it falls under the ambit of discussion. At all.

And I see you’ve now deleted your offending post, since I can’t find it anywhere on your blog.

[more..]