cookie-cutter comments

BooksTuesday, 20 December 2005 4:02 pm

Zero gave me this book, and I’ve been reading it on and off being so tied up with work. I remember reading it and feeling I was tossed back into the darker years of the Dark Ages. It’s something I’ve always liked about post-apocalyptic settings: you are forced into a dystopian future which, being dystopian, finds its underpinnings in the worst periods of human history, in this instance reflected in 10th or 11th Century Europe.

What fascinates me about these settings is how authors envision the behaviours of the various actors on the metaphorical stage; intellectually-able but fascinated with preternatural myths, seeing the symbolic in everything, even in the abused, silvered sliver of candy wrapping. Such a “dark age” is not merely a situation bereft of real knowledge and science, but a situation in which the participants are bereft of the intellectual capacity to grasp the possibilities of science beyond myth-making. [more..]

Politics, BooksSaturday, 10 December 2005 10:57 am

digressing0001 This book caused a bit of an uproar among my colleagues a few months back when it first came out. A lawyer friend recommended this book to me, and it didn’t take me long to buy and read it.

It retailed at RM 38.00 at the Popular Bookstore, but is worth much more for various reasons. I wanted to jot down some thoughts chapter by chapter, since I thought this was worth doing, but I think it would be better if people bought the book and read it, then come up with their own judgements about his arguments.

Firstly, a note on copyright: should the publisher wish that I remove the picture, I will do so.

Secondly, I think I can only make general comments on the substance of the book, rather than examine some of the arguments closely since that would be contrary to the ’spirit’ of the book; it’s not an academic treatise, and I don’t think it pretends to be one. [more..]

Books, ThoughtsSunday, 25 September 2005 9:39 pm

theromantic“On the theme of the military uniform Bertrand could have supplied some such theory as this:

Once upon a time it was the Church alone that was exalted as judge over mankind, and every layman knew that was a sinner. Nowadays, it is the layman who has to judge his fellow-sinner if all values are not to fall into anarchy, and instead of weeping with him, brother must say to brother: “You have done wrong.” [more..]

BooksTuesday, 13 September 2005 9:17 pm

The picture on the cover of my book portrays a gentleman in black, stiff collar awash in a sea of impressionistic daubs, and the stark blackness so contradictory like a stiff veil. His lips are pursed and his right hand dangles a cigarette like an afterthought. The portrait is like an afterthought. A semblance of an afterthought, relegating the subject further into the background: he looks a part of the hazy yellows and greens behind him, but for his black attire.

[more..]

BooksWednesday, 3 August 2005 10:50 pm

It was between 1843 and 1844 that Alexandre Dumas wrote “The Three Musketeers”. I don’t know why I picked up the book, maybe because it was good ‘literashure’. I picked it up along with some others mostly because my lovable kid brudder is gaga over “The Man in the Iron Mask”, another Dumas favourite it seems. I’m not normally interested in court intrigues or epic tales of derring-do (yah, right, sure..) so I thought “why not, lah; 2nd hand RM6.00 only lah” and bought it.

I’ve not finished it but one part got me in fits of laughter. I mean, first I stared at the page, eyes really wide, and then I started laughing incredulously when I decoded what was written… ok, let me just point out, hor, that I’m:-

  1. Not a bloddy lit student, ok?
  2. Not one of those ‘elegantly wasted’ metrosexual geeks with a penchant for disconnected post-post-modern love, ok?
  3. Not one of those overly cynical bastards about romance, hor; I mean, a bit’s fine, and some bits are just too damn much lah
  4. [Insert appropriate disclaimer for possible future bad behaviour]

Having said that, wahlan, check out the CHEESE!!

D’Artagnan took her hand and kissed it ardently.

“Oh, I wish I’d never met you!” he cried with that spontaneous bluntness that women often prefer to polite affectation because it reveals what is really in a man’s heart and shows that his emotion has won out over his reason (mon dieu! take deep breath… — ed.)

“I can’t say the same,” Madame Bonacieux replied almost lovingly, squeezing the hand that still held hers. “What’s lost for now isn’t lost for the future. Some day, when I’m free to speak, I will satisfy your curiousity.”

“And will you also satisfy my love?” asked D’Artagnan, overjoyed.

“I can’t promise that. It will depend on the feelings you’re able to arouse in me.” (mon dieu! invitation to treat! — ed.)

Cringe-worthy-goosebump-inducing-spiel lor.

And all this not bloddy two bloddy hours after they meet! I wonder if you see the same sort of melodrama in trashy romance novels in our day and age ;) .

Personal, BooksMonday, 25 July 2005 9:40 pm

I discovered Michael Moorcock about 6 or 7 years ago when, in desperation for anything fresh in the fantasy genre, I picked up what was described as an ‘omnibus’ featuring an effete-looking skinny white dude with the title ‘Elric of Melnibone’ emblazoned in orange-gold lettering just above that decidedly anorexic face.

I was looking for something fresh and I stumbled upon something that was written in the ’60s. Yay, me.

I read and read and read, and couldn’t stop myself reading; the next week, I rushed back to the old MPH in Holiday Plaza and bought the rest of the ‘omnibuses’ on display: one about Hawkmoon (super!) and another about Corum (my fave) in that whole Eternal Champion cycle.

Since then, I pretty much moved away from reading fantasy and started down other paths, which was all well and good, but I never lost the itch for a rousing, good yarn with assorted beasties and technicolor magical effects (heh). So last Friday, my colleague and I took a (long-ish) detour while our bosses were away and found ourselves in this tiny little second-hand bookshop tucked away in a dilapidated, terraced row of shop-houses somewhere along the road from Senai to Johor Bahru town.

We called the shop “Shakespeare” as a convenient shorthand for “Shaik Peer Bombay Bookstore” (the owner suggested it!). The place was no bigger than 20′ x 40′, but we were immediately assailed by decades of accumulated dust thick on the books and shelves.

The books on display looked older than my grandfather, which in turn seemed to be confirmed by our hosts, an Indian Muslim man and his wife, who looked as old as dirt itself. But he had all the charm of my dearly departed grand-dad, and so we got along well, though I was more interested in ploughing through his books.

And boy did I find some gems! Buried deep in a pile of Barbara Cartland-ish pulp romances, I found Michael Moorcock’s Masters of the Pit! Which isn’t saying much since, at the time, I didn’t know just exactly what I had in hand. I had the vague notion that it was a hard-to-find book (if not out-of-print; it definitely looked old enough!), but being a Moorcock it had to be good, lah. I didn’t know or care, I was like a puppy with a freshly-mangled bone :p.

Later that night, I got down to reading ‘Masters of the Pit’, and found it wasn’t all that bad. It’s told in the first person, and written in short, even terse, paragraphs and sentences. Much of it is narrative with bits of dialogue interspersed here and there; it felt less like a book and more like a rehearsal of a plot outline. It definitely lacked the polish of some of the later Elric stories I’ve read, and plot lines quite literally disappeared or were artificially resolved prematurely in some places.

But damn, was it funny! There was one particular part in the book when the main protagonist, Michael Kane, has this sort of interior monologue about society and such:

“Fear,” she said

I nodded, wondering if that deep emotion was not the essential cause of most ills (wah, very like the stuff in the movie ‘Equilibrium’ – ed.). Were not all political systems, all arts, all human actions channelled towards creating that one valuable sense of security we all, in our own ways, sought – an absence of fear? It was fear that produced madness, fear that produced war. Fear, indeed, that often produced the things we feared most. Was this why the fearless man was lauded – because he did not represent a threat to others? Perhaps, though there were many kinds of fearless people, and a total fearlessness produced a whole man, a man who had no need to display his fearlessness. The true hero, in fact – the often unsung hero.

Ok, I must admit, not only did I laugh, I was reminded of that short cartoon in Michael Moore’s “Bowling for Columbine”. I don’t know why.

Imagine a Michael Kane in a ’60s retro-futuristic costume on the set of a faux Mars, intoning the above with dead seriousness (cue cheesy violin set pieces)… you get the idea :D .

Time to start digging into the other books I found!